"If you leave the country having raised money for your startup, you’ll now have to pay an exit tax of >30% of your startup’s valuation - even if you never got a dollar out of the startup personally!" 😳 Always awkward to see places in Europe think they can create vibrant startup ecosystems by instituting absurd anti entrepreneurial friction points. 🤦🏻♂️ Norway, this is dumb. I know you're not the only country in Europe that has done this, but that doesn't make it smart or right. Honestly, the fact that Germany does something similar should be evidence enough that it's not a good policy for startups. Fix it. Good on Alex Svanevik for calling it out! 👍🏻 🇳🇴 ❄️ 🏔 https://lnkd.in/eR7RJhME #vc #venturecapital #startups #entrepreneurs #entrepreneurship #tech #technology #innovation #future #money #business
So sad to see these initiatives. The devil is in the details of course, but Europe is already struggling building great companies. This wont help 🥴
What a terrible policy.
Boy, do I have news for you! The US is no different. Even more, the moment you are here, as a founder (it does not matter if E1, L1, H1, or whatever else), over the average threshold of about 122 days, now you are the same as a US citizen in the eyes of the IRS, and you are about to have real "fun" if you own anything outside the US. Got the coveted Green Card? You will be paying tax now until death do part or you go through the exit and renunciation process and pay exit taxes. Work with the system. Don't whine about it.
This is a fairly loaded post and one that, I think, simplifies a very complex issue. Technically if value has been created in Norway and then the upside is being taken away from the country, what's unfair about the country taking a share of the original value it's helped to create? In the example in this post the founder has become a multi-millionaire, so if this is due in part to positive things done by the Norwegian government then arguably it's not much different to buying out a shareholder. The bigger question I have is whether the Norwegian government has done anything to deserve this exit tax. If not, it's very unfair, but if so I can understand their reasons for implementing it. A more constructive discussion would focus on what governments outside of places like America can do to stimulate their startup ecosystems... Tax cuts are great in theory but America isn't exactly a beacon of best practice government accountability. And, as noted in other comments to this post, they also have exit taxes for startups... I think with these discussions context and data are everything, but let's not let these things get in the way of a viral LinkedIn post! 😉
You made $ 3 million personal profit in Norway and wish to move it away with zero taxes? For most startups the hard times are in beginning and that's where it counts. Taxing the minority of startups who made it, allows to offer better startup environment for all startups. If looking at all founders, making it easier for all startups in beginning and taxing a bit more from those rare who make it to million scale, is a win for majority of founders. There is also mentions in Nordic countries that very large part of successful startups are being bought to USA and the country that enabled the break through looses them when the big profits are started to be made.
True, Germany does a similar thing. Total bummer.
Serial Entrepreneur for 22 years | 2 exits | Raised $140m | Solving worthy deeptech problems with brilliant people | Dad to 2 Kids
1moKetil Lindseth - someone should talk some sense to those who decided this….